Where our benchmarks come from.
A benchmark you can't trace is just a number someone made up. Every figure our tools compare against is listed here with its source, date, and an honest confidence rating — and we tell you plainly where good data doesn't exist yet.
Our rules, kept deliberately strict:
Rate metrics only. We benchmark percentages and ratios (conversion, churn, click, funnel steps) — not rupee figures like CPC or CAC. A foreign-currency benchmark misleads more than it helps; we'll only add absolute-money benchmarks when we have India-sourced data.
Ranges, never false precision. Sources disagree — ecommerce "average" conversion alone ranges from 1.6% to 2.9% depending on who's counting. We show the low–median–high and cite who said it.
Geography is flagged. Most public data is Global or US-weighted; India-specific benchmarks are genuinely scarce. We label it rather than pretend a US number is an Indian one.
Heuristics are kept separate from sourced data. "3:1 LTV:CAC" is a rule of thumb, not a measured benchmark — it's tagged as such below.
Nothing is invented. If we don't have a verified source for a metric in your context, the tools say so and exclude it — they never fill the gap with a made-up figure.
The current benchmark set
Rendered live from the same data our tools use — so this page can never fall out of sync. 23 records.
| Metric | Segment | Geography | Range (low · median · high) | Confidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecommerce conversion rateSite-wide sessions→purchase. Cross-source range: 1.6% (Statista) to 2.9% (Dynamic Yield). | All industries | Global | 1.6% 2.5% 2.9%(higher is better) | medium | Contentsquare via Smart Insights (2025) |
| Ecommerce conversion rate — Food & beverageLow price points and habitual buying lift conversion. | Food & beverage | Global | 4.9% 5.5% 6.2%(higher is better) | medium | Smart Insights (2025) |
| Ecommerce conversion rate — LuxuryHigh-consideration purchases convert lower. | Luxury & jewelry | Global | 0.8% 1.1% 1.5%(higher is better) | medium | Smart Insights (2025) |
| Ecommerce conversion rate — IndiaIndia runs below the ~2.5% global average — general ecommerce ~1.6%, category spread ~1.0% (electronics, furniture) to ~2.4% (books & stationery). The source does not disclose sample size or methodology, so treat as directional only. | All industries | India | 1% 1.6% 2.4%(higher is better) | low | Noir & Blanco 2026 Conversion Benchmark Report (2026) |
| Google Ads (search) conversion rateLanding-page conversion on paid search — distinct from site-wide CVR. US-weighted; India CPCs/CVRs differ. | All industries | Global (US-weighted) | 2.55% 7.52% 14.67%(higher is better) | med-high | WordStream (2025–2026)Sample: ~13,000 campaigns, 23 industries |
| Email open rateApple Mail Privacy Protection inflates opens — treat as directional only, prefer click rate. | All industries | Global | 21% 28% 34%(higher is better) | low | Mailchimp (2025) |
| Email click-through rateMore reliable than open rate post-MPP. | All industries | Global | 2% 3% 5%(higher is better) | medium | Mailchimp / Salesforce (2025) |
| Email open rate — IndiaIndia average ~25.8% across GetResponse’s 4.4B-email set; industry spread ~17–45%. Like all open rates, inflated by Apple Mail Privacy Protection — directional only, prefer click rate. India click-rate data is too inconsistent across sources to publish honestly. | All industries | India | 20% 26% 42%(higher is better) | low | GetResponse 2024 (via CampaignHQ, India) (2024) |
| SaaS monthly churn — B2B SMB | B2B SMB | Global | 3% 4% 5%(lower is better) | medium | Vitally / CustomerGauge (2025) |
| SaaS monthly churn — B2B Mid-market | B2B Mid-market | Global | 1.5% 2.25% 3%(lower is better) | medium | Vitally / CustomerGauge (2025) |
| SaaS monthly churn — B2B EnterpriseBest-in-class enterprise < 1% monthly. | B2B Enterprise | Global | 1% 1.5% 2%(lower is better) | medium | Vitally / CustomerGauge (2025) |
| SaaS monthly churn — B2C | B2C | Global | 5% 6.7% 8%(lower is better) | medium | CustomerGauge (2025) |
| B2B visitor → leadTop 10% reach 8–15%. | B2B | Global | 0.8% 2.3% 5%(higher is better) | medium | SalesHive / GrowthSpree (2025–2026) |
| B2B MQL → SQLTop performers with strong scoring reach ~40%. | B2B | Global | 12% 13% 21%(higher is better) | medium | Data-Mania / GrowthSpree (2025–2026) |
| B2B opportunity → customer | B2B | Global | 22% 26% 30%(higher is better) | low-medium | GrowthSpree (2026) |
| Cart abandonment rateBaymard documents a ~70.2% cross-study average (stable near 70% for years). Lower is better; the band is illustrative around that average, not measured quartiles — vertical spread is wide (~45–91%). | All industries | Global | 65% 70% 78%(lower is better) | medium | Baymard Institute (2025)Sample: meta-analysis of ~50 studies |
| Landing page conversion rateMedian 6.6% across industries; low end ~3.8% (SaaS), high ~12.3% (events & entertainment). Distinct from site-wide ecommerce CVR. | All industries | Global (US-weighted) | 3.8% 6.6% 12.3%(higher is better) | medium | Unbounce Conversion Benchmark Report (2024 (updated 2025))Sample: 41,000 landing pages, 57M conversions |
| Meta ads CTR — traffic objectiveTraffic-objective click-through rate, US medians (India differs). Range spans lowest (auto repair ~0.8%) to highest (shopping & gifts ~4.1%) industries. | All industries | US | 0.8% 1.71% 4.13%(higher is better) | med-high | WordStream (LocaliQ) (2024–2025)Sample: 554 US campaigns (medians) |
| Meta ads conversion rate — leads objectiveLead-form conversion rate on Meta lead campaigns, US medians. Range from furniture (~3.8%) to restaurants & food (~18.3%). | All industries | US | 3.77% 7.72% 18.25%(higher is better) | medium | WordStream (LocaliQ) (2024–2025)Sample: 726 US campaigns (medians) |
| SaaS trial → paid — opt-in (no card)No-card trials ~18% (18.2% organic / 17.4% paid); top quartile 35–45%. A "conversion" here counts a single paid month — weigh with retention. | Opt-in trial (no credit card) | Global | 15% 18% 22%(higher is better) | medium | First Page Sage (2025) |
| SaaS trial → paid — opt-out (card required)Card-required trials ~49% (48.8% organic / 51% paid) — about 2.7× opt-in, but far fewer trials start. Trades trial volume for conversion. | Opt-out trial (credit card required) | Global | 45% 49% 55%(higher is better) | medium | First Page Sage (2025) |
| SaaS freemium free → paidFree→paid ~2.6–2.8%. Freemium drives sign-up volume but converts low; elite products reach 6–8%. | Freemium self-serve | Global | 2% 3% 5%(higher is better) | medium | First Page Sage (2025) |
| LTV : CAC ratio heuristicA 3:1 reference is a rule of thumb, not a measured benchmark. The right target depends on margin, cash, retention, stage and model. | General rule of thumb | Global | 1:1 3:1 3:1(higher is better) | reference | Common industry heuristic |
Confidence reflects source rigour and agreement — e.g. email open rates are marked low because Apple Mail Privacy Protection inflates them. We review and expand this set over time; the goal is depth we can stand behind, not a sprawling half-sourced table.
Want benchmarks that actually fit your business?
Public benchmarks are a starting point, not the truth about your account. A Foundation Audit builds you a measurement baseline from your own data — the only benchmark that really counts.
Discuss your growth project